Transcriber's Note:

Inconsistent hyphenation and spelling in the original document have been preserved.
Obvious typographical errors have been corrected.For a complete list, please see the end of this document.





HISTORICAL MATERIALISM





HISTORICAL MATERIALISM

AND THE

ECONOMICS OF KARL MARX

By BENEDETTO CROCE

TRANSLATED BY C.M. MEREDITH
With an Introduction by A.D. LINDSAY
Fellow and Lecturer of Balliol College, Oxford



Publisher's Mark



LONDON: GEORGE ALLEN & UNWIN LTD.
RUSKIN HOUSE, MUSEUM STREET, W.C.
NEW YORK   :   :   :   :   :   :   :   :   THE MACMILLAN CO.





First published by Howard Latimer Ltd.       1914
Transferred to George Allen & Unwin Ltd.      1915






[ALL RIGHTS RESERVED]




[v]

CONTENTS

Introductionix
CHAPTER I
Concerning the Scientific Form of Historical Materialism 
 
1. Scope of essay: Labriola's book implies that historical  materialism is not a philosophy of history: Distinction  between a philosophy of history and philosophising about  history: Reason why two have been confused: Materialistic  theory of History as stated by Labriola not an attempt to  establish a law of history: This contrasted with theories  of monists, and teleologists: Engels' statement that it is  a new method erroneous: New content not new method
2
 
2. Historical materialism a mass of new data of which  historian becomes conscious: Does not state that history  is nothing more than economic history, nor does it provide  a theory of history: Is simply investigation of influence  economic needs have exercised in history: This view does  not detract from its importance
12
 
3. Questions as to relations between historical  materialism and socialism; Only possible connection lies  in special historical application: Bearing of historica                        
...
                        
BU KİTABI OKUMAK İÇİN ÜYE OLUN VEYA GİRİŞ YAPIN!

                        
Sitemize Üyelik ÜCRETSİZDİR!